NEWS Florida’s Deloitte-run computer system cut off new moms entitled to Medicaid

NEWS Florida’s Deloitte-run computer system cut off new moms entitled to Medicaid

Cases and issues

PROTECTING DUE PROCESS RIGHTS OF VULNERABLE MEDICAID RECIPIENTS

Chianne D., et al. v. Weida, et al.: Verified Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Along with our partners at the National Health Law Program, FHJP filed suit in federal court to challenge inadequate Medicaid notices that violate recipients due process right. At issue in the suit are the notices these agencies are using to alert people that their Medicaid coverage is ending. In just three months, more than 182,000 Floridians have been issued notices saying they are no longer eligible for coverage, and hundreds of thousands more will have their coverage reviewed in the coming year. As alleged in the Complaint, low-income individuals who are losing Medicaid coverage have no idea whether the State is making the right decision and whether (or how) to challenge their loss of coverage.

Harrell et al. vs. Poppell et al.: Class Action Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief

This class action successfully challenged Florida’s system-wide failure to protect the due process rights of extremely vulnerable beneficiaries, including children with disabilities aging out of the state’s adoption assistance program. The case resulted in significant corrective actions, including restoration of Medicaid for over 32,000.

Loading

ENSURING ACCESS TO MEDICALLY NECESSARY CARE FOR VULNERABLE CHILDREN, PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, AND OTHER MARGINALIZED GROUPS

W.B. et al. vs. Marstiller: Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Although numerous Florida courts of appeal have found that Florida’s standard to determine coverage of children’s Medicaid services is more restrictive than that set forth in the federal Medicaid Act, the state Medicaid agency refuses to correct it. This federal class action lawsuit seeks to stop Florida from denying care to children based on its overly restrictive standard.

Dekker et al. v. Marstiller et al.: Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive and other Relief

In response to a state rule denying Medicaid coverage of all medically necessary gender-affirming care for transgender Florida residents, FHJP, along with Lambda Legal, Southern Legal Counsel, the National Health Law Program, and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, filed a federal lawsuit. The rule left thousands of transgender people in Florida without access to critical medical care for the treatment of gender dysphoria. The Florida Medicaid Agency finalized the rule after ignoring expert testimony and thousands of public comments during the rule-making process. In May 2022, FHJP and co-counsel participated in a three week trial in the Northern District of Florida. Shortly before the close of trial, the Governor signed Fla. Stat. 286.31 into law which, among other things, prohibited the use of Medicaid funding to pay for gender affirming medical care. Counsel amended their Complaint to challenge this newly enacted ban along with AHCA’s rule. On June 21, 2023, the Honorable Judge Robert L. Hinkle entered a 54 page long Order declaring that both the rule and the statute violate the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, the Affordable Care Act, and the federal Medicaid Act and, as such, could not be enforced against Florida Medicaid beneficiaries.

Meza et al. v. Marstiller: Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Although the Florida Medicaid program covers the cost of incontinence supplies for medically incontinent children, the state stops paying for this essential medical service when the child turns 21. Along with co-counsel Disability Rights Florida (serving as both co-counsel and an organizational plaintiff) and Lewis Golinker, FHJP filed a class action complaint asking that the federal court order the state to provide much needed medical supplies for plaintiffs like Blanca M., a 22 year old Floridian who suffers from multiple disabilities, including spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, and who relies on a gastronomy tube for nutrition.

Dobson vs. Secretary of Health and Human Services

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Medicare must provide coverage for a beneficiary’s off-label use of a critically needed medication.

Jones et al. vs. Agency of Health Care Administration (AHCA): Unpromulgated Rule Challenge in the Division of Administrative Hearings

The Florida Medicaid Agency was refusing priority enrollment into the Long Term Care (LTC) waiver for 18-20 year old medically fragile youth who need 24-hour health care, an essential protection designed to ensure that critical health services are not reduced when the child turns 21. Shortly after FHJP and Disability Rights Florida filed an administrative petition challenging the agency’s erroneous interpretation of state law, the agency undertook extensive and robust corrective actions.​

Loading

ENSURING TRANSPARENCY IN MEDICAID FAIR HEARINGS

Wright vs. Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA): Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

The Florida Medicaid Agency’s refusal to publicly post fair hearing decisions makes it impossible for advocates and pro se litigants to fully understand adverse actions by managed care organizations and the agency decisions when those actions are challenged. This case seeks to ensure that AHCA will post orders on a publicly accessible website. ​

Loading

ENSURING THAT FORMER FOSTER CHILDREN RETAIN MEDICAID

DCF Policy & Process to Continue Eligibility Under Former Foster Care Medicaid Category Violates Federal Medicaid Law

Although the Affordable Care Act (ACA) required coverage for youth aging out of foster care until age 26 (“Former Foster Care” Medicaid), Florida’s application process resulted in former foster care children losing their Medicaid, and as of July 2020, only 67 children were in the program. In response to the detailed legal demand letter sent by FHJP and our partners, the state implemented corrective actions.
Visit the “Medicaid | The Lived Experience: Former Foster Care Children” page.

Loading

PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF CAREGIVERS AND FRAIL SENIORS

Home health care benefits are critical for low-income Floridians who are so frail and disabled that they require home and community based services (HCBS) as an alternative to institutionalization. FHJP successfully combines storytelling with litigation, a strategy which both helps individual storytellers/plaintiffs secure their health care rights and helps educate the public and decision makers about the importance of HCBS.

Thelma & Hortense vs. Medicaid Managed Care Plan

Thelma quit a good job to care for her elderly mother (who needs care 24/7), when her mother’s Medicaid managed care plan promised to pay Thelma for 41 hours/week at $10.76/hour and provide home delivered meals. Instead, the plan kept cutting Thelma’s hours and pay and stopped providing meals.​

Diwantie & Mankuar vs. Medicaid Managed Care Plan

When her 87-year-old mother, Mankuar, fractured her back, it fell upon her daughter Diwantie to pick up the pieces, becoming her mother’s voice and caretaker through the travails of hospital and rehabilitation center visits.​

Therese vs. Medicaid Managed Care Plan | Chapter 1

Therese has twice been erroneously terminated from her Medicaid Long-Term Care benefits, and was helped by FHJP and a legal services partner. Then, in the midst of the COVID-19 crisis, Therese’s bureaucratic nightmare with her Medicaid Long-Term Care managed care plan entered a new chapter.​

Therese vs. Medicaid Managed Care Plan | Chapter 2

Therese has twice been erroneously terminated from her Medicaid Long-Term Care benefits, and was helped by FHJP and a legal services partner. Then, in the midst of the COVID-19 crisis, Therese’s bureaucratic nightmare with her Medicaid Long-Term Care managed care plan entered a new chapter.​

Barbara & Haydee vs. Medicaid Managed Care Plan

Barbara is officially retired from law enforcement but she still works as a part-time reading coach and runs a tutoring business, all while caring for her 89-year-old mother, Haydee, and challenging unfair cuts to her mother’s home health care services.​​

Thelma & Hortense vs. Medicaid Managed Care Plan

Thelma quit a good job to care for her elderly mother (who needs care 24/7), when her mother’s Medicaid managed care plan promised to pay Thelma for 41 hours/week at $10.76/hour and provide home delivered meals. Instead, the plan kept cutting Thelma’s hours and pay and stopped providing meals.​
Loading
Skip to content